The Operator Ψ for the Chromatic Number of a Graph ∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigate hierarchies of semidefinite approximations for the chromatic number χ(G) of a graph G. We introduce an operator Ψ mapping any graph parameter β(G), nested between the stability number α(G) and χ(G), to a new graph parameter Ψ β (G), nested between α(G) and χ(G); Ψ β (G) is polynomial time computable if β(G) is. As an application, there is no polynomial time computable graph parameter nested between the fractional chromatic number χ * (·) and χ(·) unless P = NP. Moreover, based on the Motzkin–Straus formulation for α(G), we give (quadratically constrained) quadratic and copositive programming formulations for χ(G). Under some mild assumptions, n/β(G) ≤ Ψ β (G), but, while n/β(G) remains below χ * (G), Ψ β (G) can reach χ(G) (e.g., for β(·) = α(·)). We also define new polynomial time computable lower bounds for χ(G), improving the classic Lovász theta number (and its strengthenings obtained by adding nonnegativity and triangle inequalities); experimental results on Hamming graphs, Kneser graphs, and DIMACS benchmark graphs will be given in the follow-up paper [N. 1. Introduction. The chromatic number χ(G) of a graph G = (V, E) is the minimum number of colors needed to color the nodes of G in such a way that adjacent nodes receive distinct colors. Computing χ(G) is an NP-hard problem [11], and it is also hard to approximate χ(G) within |V (G)| 1/14− for any > 0 [1]. An obvious lower bound for χ(G) is the clique number ω(G), defined as the maximum size of a clique (i.e., a set of pairwise adjacent nodes) in G; computing ω(G) is also hard [11] as well as approximating ω(G) within |V (G)| 1/6− for any > 0 [1]. A well-known stronger lower bound for χ(G) is ϑ(G) := ϑ G , the theta number of the complementary graph, introduced by Lovász [23] (see (2.3)). The theta number satisfies the " sandwich inequality " :
منابع مشابه
The distinguishing chromatic number of bipartite graphs of girth at least six
The distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the least integer $d$ such that $G$ has a vertex labeling with $d$ labels that is preserved only by a trivial automorphism. The distinguishing chromatic number $chi_{D}(G)$ of $G$ is defined similarly, where, in addition, $f$ is assumed to be a proper labeling. We prove that if $G$ is a bipartite graph of girth at least six with the maximum ...
متن کاملChromatic polynomials of some nanostars
Let G be a simple graph and (G,) denotes the number of proper vertex colourings of G with at most colours, which is for a fixed graph G , a polynomial in , which is called the chromatic polynomial of G . Using the chromatic polynomial of some specific graphs, we obtain the chromatic polynomials of some nanostars.
متن کاملComputing Multiplicative Zagreb Indices with Respect to Chromatic and Clique Numbers
The chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by χ(G), is the minimum number of colors such that G can be colored with these colors in such a way that no two adjacent vertices have the same color. A clique in a graph is a set of mutually adjacent vertices. The maximum size of a clique in a graph G is called the clique number of G. The Turán graph Tn(k) is a complete k-partite graph whose partition...
متن کاملThe locating-chromatic number for Halin graphs
Let G be a connected graph. Let f be a proper k -coloring of G and Π = (R_1, R_2, . . . , R_k) bean ordered partition of V (G) into color classes. For any vertex v of G, define the color code c_Π(v) of v with respect to Π to be a k -tuple (d(v, R_1), d(v, R_2), . . . , d(v, R_k)), where d(v, R_i) is the min{d(v, x)|x ∈ R_i}. If distinct vertices have distinct color codes, then we call f a locat...
متن کاملCommon Neighborhood Graph
Let G be a simple graph with vertex set {v1, v2, … , vn}. The common neighborhood graph of G, denoted by con(G), is a graph with vertex set {v1, v2, … , vn}, in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if they have at least one common neighbor in the graph G. In this paper, we compute the common neighborhood of some composite graphs. In continue, we investigate the relation between hamiltoni...
متن کاملOn the Edge-Difference and Edge-Sum Chromatic Sum of the Simple Graphs
For a coloring $c$ of a graph $G$, the edge-difference coloring sum and edge-sum coloring sum with respect to the coloring $c$ are respectively $sum_c D(G)=sum |c(a)-c(b)|$ and $sum_s S(G)=sum (c(a)+c(b))$, where the summations are taken over all edges $abin E(G)$. The edge-difference chromatic sum, denoted by $sum D(G)$, and the edge-sum chromatic sum, denoted by $sum S(G)$, a...
متن کامل